Tuesday, March 19, 2013

First Four (aka We still need to win one more to get in)

North Carolina Agricultural and Technical, Liberty, Long Island-Brooklyn, and James Madison I feel for you. Middle Tennessee, St. Mary's, La Salle, and Boise State not so much.  A few years back the Minor League Basketball Tournament expanded beyond 64 teams in an effort to get more teams involved.  More is better (just ask AT&T); however, I think it sucks for the teams who won their conference tournaments and are now stuck in what is essentially a play-in game.  This tournament is the pinnacle for these teams and their players, unfortunately only half of them will actually get there.  I do not mind the play-in game for the teams who were on the so-called bubble, but I also think it is pretty useless.  These teams do not advance far enough to make a difference in the tournament.  Pick the 64 teams and move forward (I know the argument is made that job success is determined by tournament berths, but I hope the folks who make those decisions have a better idea of what is going on).

As outlined yesterday, I am ranking the watchability of the games in each round in an effort to focus my limited time in front of the TV.  The two parameters I am looking at are projected margin of victory  and average tempo of each game.  I am ranking the parameters for each game and then taking the average of the two rankings.  One is the best score possible.  The final result is a game score similar to NERD that was introduced by Carson Cistulli at Fangraphs, which he uses to rank baseball games every night.  If you have limited time, choose the game with the lowest score and watch that game.  The break down for the games on Tuesday and Wednesday is below.


And the winner is Long Island-Brooklyn vs. James Madison.  Long Island-Brooklyn plays at the fastest pace among the eight schools listed and gives up a ton of points.   My advice would be to watch this game if you have the chance.  I am personally also going to watch the Middle Tennessee vs. St. Mary's matchup as well because I have either of those teams upsetting Memphis in Round 2.

Happy watching.  I'll be back on Thursday to break down Round 2.

Monday, March 18, 2013

Minor League March Madness, Baby!



The time has come for us to celebrate the Annual Minor League Basketball Tournament, also known as the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Tournament.  I do not like to use the term NCAA or the names of the universities involved in said tournament because the NCAA and its amateurism is a sham.  Let's call this thing what it truly is and recognize it is a minor league basketball tournament.  It is filled with great drama and story lines, but make no mistake - it is minor league basketball.  While the games are not usually well played, they are generally close in score and the players are playing their butts off from the tip-off to the final whistle (which cannot be said for most NBA games, even in the playoffs).  The real draw is the single elimination tournament.  The possibility of elimination (and the possibility of filling out an incorrect bracket) is what feeds the madness and holds our interest.

Even its greatest skeptics have to admit, minor league basketball is fun to watch.  I will admit that I did not watch much regular season minor league basketball this year (read: I did not watch a single game).  However, I did watch the conference tourneys the past week and I have been looking over the wonderful statistics available at kenpom.com to prep for the tourney.  As a result, I am an expert on minor league basketball and as a result, you should help me guide your viewing.  

Drama and pace are a two things I am planning to pay attention to as the tournament unfolds.  Close games are great to watch, so I am choosing to focus on those games in the hopes of getting more drama (sorry Mary J).  After crunching some numbers I have ranked the games based on projected score and I plan to keep the closest eye on the ones I project to be the most bitterly fought and have the smallest margin of victory.  Second, I am going to try to watch the games that have the fastest pace.  After reading the Grantland.com article about how West Liberty University loves to push the pace of the game, I realized how bad it is to watch low scoring, poorly played, and terribly executed minor league basketball.   Therefore, I am going to focus on the games that will have the fastest tempo - frankly, to avoid falling asleep.  

Margin of victory and tempo are the two trends that I find most interesting.  I will post the rankings for projected margin of victory for the with the quickest pace before each round of the tournament.  These will be updated after each round so keep coming back as the tournament progesses.  Tomorrow I will preview the 1st round games, also known as the "First Four" and previously known as the "Play-In Game".

Finally, join the Marcello Ball Tourney Pick 'Em group on Yahoo!  I am trying to come up a prize for the winner.  At the very least you tell me how poor my prognostication skills are.


Sunday, February 3, 2013

Is Kevin Garnett Happy?

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/culture/kevin-garnett-crosses-line-with-carmelo-anthony-14958811

I watched the 2nd half of the Clippers vs. Celtics game on Sunday February 3rd. The Celtics were victorious 106-104 after losing a double digit lead. As players of the opposing teams exchanged hugs and semi-elaborate handshakes Kevin Garnett walked alone to the locker room. This made me ponder, is Kevin Garnett happy?

During the 2nd quarter Garnett was involved in two physical plays. Drawing a foul on Matt Barnes, by over-acting. And he earned a technical foul for elbowing Blake Griffin. In both of these situations his teammates came to assist him, but he seemed to not let the issue go. While Griffin and Barnes talked to teammates, Garnett just stood angrily staring into the distance.

The Boston Celtics won, but this did not seem to make him happy. Much has been made lately about his trash talking and how he is a player that you want on your team, but hate if he is on your opponent. Regardless of this, is he happy? It sure does not seem like it. Garnett's playing days are numbered and he will journey into the next stage of his life with a lot of money (close to $300 million in salary), but with how many good memories while playing? Will he be a secluded ex-player or turn into a lovable legend for his dedication to the game...see Bill Russell, Michael Jordan?

I doubt that he will be remembered as well as Russell or Jordan because he has been involved in more drama on the court. Plus, he has not won as much as those two players. If he will not be remember that way then it will be as a over-reacting trash-talking fierce competitor that many fans hate.

We idolize these fierce competitors that will do anything to win. But, is this the message that we want to send to future generations. Do you want your son or daughter to grow up and be like Kevin Garnett?

Perhaps you might, from a athletic standpoint. But what about as a person?

Kevin Garnett legacy will be as great basketball player and ....... the rest is still up to him and I hope it is not too late for him to become a person that future generations should strive to become.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2010/09/25/nba-to-crack-down-on-overt-complaining/





President Taft

I love the National Presidential Race, even though it is a copy of the Sausage Race in Milwaukee. There was the excitement when Teddy Roosevelt won for the 1st time EVER. The most recent story line in the Presidential Race is that a new President will partake in the race. 27th President William Howard Taft. 
Susan Walsh
Congratulations to William Howard Taft's family, he deserves to be idolized in a way that isn't for getting stuck in the White House bathtub only to be removed by aides using butter for lubrication. William Howard Taft was a great lawyer and a less accomplished President, losing a bid for re-election. He was the only President to later serve on the Supreme Court. 

 But, does Taft deserve this honor? The four other participants of the race are Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, and Teddy Roosevelt. These four presidents have their flaws, but are very highly regarded. Taft's accomplishments do not compare to winning the Revolutionary War, writing the Declaration of Independence, signing the 13 Amendment, or establishing the National Park System.  

 The argument for Taft is that he has strong connections to baseball, he was the first President to throw out a first pitch. Other President's might have done this if the game had been more popular at his time. We are giving credit for a ceremonial duty. What about F.D.R.? A popular president, was elected 4 times. Plus we could show some diversity by including a President in a wheelchair.

President's Name2009 Final ScoreOverall Ranking
20092000
Abraham Lincoln90211
George Washington85423
Franklin D. Roosevelt83732
Theodore Roosevelt78144
Harry S. Truman70855
John F. Kennedy70168
Thomas Jefferson69877
Dwight D. Eisenhower68989
Woodrow Wilson68396
Ronald Reagan6711011
Lyndon B. Johnson6411110
James K. Polk6061212
Andrew Jackson6061313
James Monroe6051414
Bill Clinton6051521
William McKinley5991615
John Adams5451716
George H. W. Bush5421820
John Quincy Adams5421919
James Madison5352018
Grover Cleveland5232117
Gerald R. Ford5092223
Ulysses S. Grant4902333
William Howard Taft4852424


Historians would agree with me about other Presidents being more deserving of this honor. In a C-SPAN poll completed by historians in 2009 and 2000 ranked Taft 24th. Notable Presidents I would have chosen are F.D.R.(in the wheelchair), J.F.K.(because I love initials, in a convertible), Ronald Reagan (demented and always running the wrong direction), or Andrew Jackson. Jackson, noted Native-American slayer, could be included now that the Nationals do not play in the same park as the Redskins.

Nationals you had marketing gold with Teddy Roosevelt last year and you could have ridden that train longer. Including, Taft is a attention grab that lacks good judgement on your choice of a President. Overall, I applaud the Nationals' effort in adding excitement to the ballpark experience, but choose more wisely. 

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Give Kenny Lofton Some Hall of Fame Love

http://blog.cleveland.com/sports/2007/07/uploft.jpj.jpg

Kenny Lofton was a damn good centerfielder. After the shambolic votes for this year’s Baseball Hall of Fame were reported, I was sad to see that Kenny Lofton would not be on the ballot again in the future. He deserved a better fate and more recognition. Instead his career got caught up in the incessant arguments about the steroid era and he will never get is due.

Kenny Kenny, as I like to refer to him, was the catalyst to the great Cleveland Indians offense in the mid-90s. I will always remember him with his big hitch in his left-handed swing mashing balls to right and slashing others to left. I’ll also remember him for the swagger he played the game with and especially that awesome gold diamond pendant with the “K” in the middle (That pendant was boss and I’m glad to see it is Kenny’s background photo for his Twitter account). He was a great centerfielder with prototypical leadoff skills.

Kenny broke finally broke into the league in 1991 after being in the minors for a few years and finishing a great college BASKETBALL career at Arizona. Yes, basketball. Kenny Lofton did not even play baseball until his junior year of college and he was drafted that year by the Astros (he played minor league ball that summer, but went back to UA to get his degree and finish his senior season of basketball). Kenny Kenny hit his stride until 1992 when he was traded to the Indians. In 1992, he ended with 6.3 WAR (calculatedby FanGraphs) and followed that up with a 7.3 WAR season in 1993 and a 6.9 in 1994. According to FanGraphs rule-of-thumb WAR chart, those are three MVP type seasons during Kenny’s first three full seasons in the bigs. Pretty freaking good. Kenny followed that up with three more “Superstar” and “All-Star” seasons during his career.

    Kenny Lofton's WAR by Year
           Year  WAR  Caliber
     1993  7.3  MVP
     1994  6.9  MVP
     1992  6.3  MVP
     1998  5.9  Superstar 
     1997  5.5  Superstar
     1996  5.1  Superstar
     1999  4.8  All-Star
     2003  4.4  All-Star
     1995  4.1  All-Star
     2005  3.9  Good Player
     2000  3.1  Good Player
     2007  2.8  Solid Starter
     2002  2.6  Solid Starter
     2006  1.6  Role Player
     2001  1.5  Role Player
     2004  0.5  Scrub

When evaluating a player’s career, I don’t really like to count the number of MVPs, Gold Gloves, All-Star appearances, etc. because they all have qualitative elements that depend on who was voting for those awards. Instead I prefer to look at career WAR and use that to compare players of the generation of interest. I define a generation of players as those who careers either start or end during the career of the player being evaluated. For example, Kenny Lofton’s generation of players are those whose careers included playing between 1992 and 2007. The first season that Kenny Lofton logged more than 130 at bats (thus, making him ineligible for the Rookie of the Year award) was 1992 (the same year he lit Cleveland on fire with a 6.3 WAR). And Kenny’s last season was 2007. Therefore, his generation of players includes any players that played at least one season between 1992 and 2007.

Now that we defined Kenny’s generation of players lets see how he stacks up against them in Career WAR (cWAR). Kenny’s career ended with him accumulating 66.3 cWAR, which is ranked 40th amongst batters in his generation. By comparison, Kenny’s cWAR is less than Gary Sheffield (66.6) and Dave Winfield (67.7), but greater than Sammy Sosa (64.2) and Andre Dawson (62.9). Not to shabby.



If we look at Kenny compared to other centerfielders of his generation we more of his true value. I always like to compare players to others who played the same position. I think it gives a more fair assessment of how this player compared to his peers. First baseman and centerfielders are going to have very different profiles. When comparing Kenny to other CFs, he has the 4th highest cWAR of players who careers spanned 1992-2007. Ken Griffey, Jr. is number one in cWAR, accumulating 85.2 wins, followed by Andruw Jones (67.9) and Jim Edmonds (66.8).



Kenny Lofton was a damn good player and a borderline Hall of Famer. I’m going to reserve judgment on whether or not I truly think he deserves to be in the Hall until I get some better perspective on the cWAR of other centerfielders already in the Hall of Fame. I big factor here is whether or not Andruw Jones and Jim Edmonds are Hall of Famers also. Regardless, I will always remember Kenny Kenny for his big hitch from the left hand side, his awesome pendant, and for motoring around the bases with his helmet ready to fall of at any second. I hope one day Kenny gets the recognition from baseball fans he deserves. At the very least he deserves to be in the discussion for the Hall of Fame for more time.


Thursday, January 10, 2013

You got what you deserve, Ryan Klesko




I hope you are not disappointed Ryan.  You aren’t a Hall of Famer in my book either.  Every Saturday Doug, Joe, and I rode our bikes to the baseball card store in the blazing heat of a Florida summer hoping to get your autograph on one of the 10 rookie cards of yours that we had.  And every Saturday you never showed up.  After about two months, we began to suspect that Al, the baseball card shop owner, might not be telling the truth about you coming to sign cards for us.  I mean it was the summer and you were obviously a baseball player, so in retrospect I’m not sure exactly how you would have ever made an appearance.  But Al had Mortal Kombat and common cards that we could stupidly purchase for pennies that would allow us to complete our sets of Upper Deck and Topps.  He couldn’t be lying to us.  Well Ryan, whatever the deal was, I have never forgiven you, and I’m glad that when I looked at the Hall of Fame voting today I saw that you did not receive one vote.  You didn’t deserve any.  Don’t disappoint children, even if it isn’t your fault.

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

3B for the Yankees

With A-Rod out indefinitely the Yankees need to find a replacement. They do not want to spend a lot of money and Jayson Nix / Eduardo Nunez / Eric Chavez will not fill void especially if Nix and Nunez need to fill in for Jeter.

Chavez does well versus right-handed pitchers. He his .299 with a .366 OBP and a .545 slugging. Against lefties he did not do as well .152 AVG, .231 OBP, and a .152 last year. For his career .275, .356 OBP, and a .501 SLG. He needs a platoon partner and my suggestion is Jeff Keppinger.

Keppinger is a free-agent, which is great for the Yankees since they don't have many trade chips. He also should come at a relatively cheap price, 2012 salary was 1.52 million, while posting a 2.8 WAR. His slash line last year was .376 / .402 / .521 vs left-handed pitchers. .302 / .352 / .403 vs righties. For his career he has a slash line of .333 / .376 / .487 against lefties.

Keppinger also provides some position flexibility with his ability to play short and second base.